7
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
7 points (81.8% liked)
techsupport
2473 readers
2 users here now
The Lemmy community will help you with your tech problems and questions about anything here. Do not be shy, we will try to help you.
If something works or if you find a solution to your problem let us know it will be greatly apreciated.
Rules: instance rules + stay on topic
Partnered communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It seems like only 5 of 6 chipset PCIe lanes are exposed on the board, so it's totally possible that they used the extra x1 for a USB card.
(The Gen 3 slots come off the CPU, so aren't counted)
Ah, I think I'm starting to understand this a little better. Is that 4 lanes for SATA and 1 for the PCIe x1 slot?
Where do you reckon the PCIe 2.0 x16 slot's lanes come from?
Nah SATA is built into the chipset. That second x16 is actually only electrically x4 in an x16 form factor, and there's that x1 slot, adding up to 5 lanes in total. The first x16 and first nvme slot (x4) are connected to the CPU directly (which IIRC most have 20 lanes on AM4, but not always).
Oh, that makes sense, thanks
My CPU (1600 AF) only has 16 lanes, but I have a graphics card and an NVMe SSD and both seem to be getting all the lanes. I wonder what's going on here
Full output
Edit:
Huh that's interesting, I believe that GPU should've been running at x8 with that CPU, but if it works then whatever I suppose.
I believe there are PCIe bandwidth benchmarks, if you really want to confirm, but I wouldn't worry.
Also it isn't uncommon for the device to just report the wrong speed, for example my Intel Arc reports running at x1, but benchmarks show otherwise.