228
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by SmokeInFog@midwest.social to c/world@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://midwest.social/post/6327031

World leaders, international rights groups and United Nations officials have criticised the United States for vetoing a UN resolution calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza and failing to halt the war that has killed more than 17,400 Palestinians and about 1,100 people in Israel since October 7.

A UN resolution on the pause in hostilities failed to pass on Friday at the UN Security Council after the United States vetoed the proposal and Britain abstained.

The remaining 13 of the 15 current members of the UNSC voted in favour of the resolution put forward by the United Arab Emirates and co-sponsored by 100 other countries.

Here are some of the reactions:

Palestine

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said the US’s veto made it “complicit” in war crimes in Gaza. “The president has described the American position as aggressive and immoral, a flagrant violation of all humanitarian principles and values, and holds the United States responsible for the bloodshed of Palestinian children, women and elderly people in the Gaza Strip,” a statement from his office said.

Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh said the veto was “a disgrace and another blank cheque given to the occupying state to massacre, destroy and displace”.

Palestine’s UN envoy Riyad Mansour told the UNSC that the result of the vote was “disastrous”. “If you are against the destruction and displacement of the Palestinian people you must stand against this war. And if you support it then you are enabling this destruction and displacement regardless of your intentions … Millions of Palestinian lives hang in the balance. Every single one of them is sacred, worth saving.”

Hamas strongly condemned the US veto, saying it considers Washington’s move “unethical and inhumane”. “The US obstruction of the issuance of a ceasefire resolution is a direct participation with the occupation in killing our people and committing more massacres and ethnic cleansing,” Izzat al-Risheq, a member of Hamas’s political bureau, said in a statement.

. . .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 4 points 11 months ago

Maybe the other veto powers should veto against the US in their next war?

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

It's a constant thing in the security council, Russia (and China) keep vetoing USA stuff and vice versa. It's the fifth time this year.

Russia vetoes calls for them to stop their invasion, USA vetoes anything not in favour of Israel in this Israel-Hamas conflict and so on.

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 11 months ago

Oh fuck. And if there was a vote for removing veto powers entirely, USA, Russia, China and a few more would leave UN, making them a even more toothless tiger. Right?

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah. None of them can tolerate stuff that would bind them. That's why by design it needs the unanimity. Trying to prevent another League of Nations situation.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 11 months ago

The US doesn't ask the UN for permission for anything, least of all wars.

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
228 points (92.2% liked)

World News

39021 readers
1221 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS