cross-posted from: https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/494473
Compared against the predominant incumbent social media platforms, the fediverse is very small.
information sources:
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.
Resources:
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
Why bluesky and threads should embrace ActivityPub.
Social media is splintering - accelerated by the fall of Twitter. It's not 2010 and a social media network is never going to be what twitter was in 2010. They'll might as well develop social media that can talk to other networks
Bluesky are never going to embrace ActivityPub... They've got their own separate federation protocol.
Bride protocols?
Yes, but I'm hoping they'll ever find a way to bridge both or change their mind.
Their protocol (called the "Authenticated Transfer Protocol" or "AT Protocol" for short) fixes some issues that ActivityPub has.
For example, you can use your own domain name as your handle, even if you're not hosting the server yourself. This makes your username portable - you can move to a different server but keep the same username. You just need to update some DNS records. It's not possible to move server but keep the same username with ActivityPub, since your username is always at the server's domain name.
What I'm hoping is that the developers of ActivityPub take some ideas onboard, but it'll be hard given the current design of the protocol. Maybe we'll get a new version of ActivityPub one day.