72
Is jQuery still the go-to JS helper library?
(programming.dev)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
72 points (97.4% liked)
Programming
17314 readers
106 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Except for animations and a few things.
What do you mean about animations?
Every use-case I can think about is already well supported by vanilla css/js without libraries or frameworks. (not including really out-there use-cases like game engines or image editors)
Can you give an example?
jQuery Effects are usually easier to work with than CSS alternatives, single predictable line with events vs multiple lines that you can't hook thing into easily. Note that I'm not defending jQuery nowadays I even void it and always prefer vanilla, but there are things on that library that are objectify easier to do.
I think you're forgetting about the Animation API.
Example: making something flash once to get a user's attention
Use CSS animations everywhere you can, but if you need to be able to hook into an animation (to dynamically change the speed, cancel something, sync animations together, etc...) you should be using the Animation API.
There's never a need for jQuery.