41
If you could change one thing in F1
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
41 points (95.6% liked)
Formula 1
9085 readers
14 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donโt want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| ๐บ๐ธ United States | 21-23 Nov |
| ๐ถ๐ฆ Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
| ๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I mean, had the race finished under the safety car as it ought to have done then we can say that Lewis would have won the race and the championship
We'd assume, yes. And I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think this would hold up in court. There's a non-zero chance Lewis' car would've died during the last lap driving slowly, for example.
I mean, courts don't work on the basis of non-zero chances.
What I'm saying is that they probably can't "invent" a race result in court by fantasizing about how it could've been.
And I'm saying extrapolating one safety car lap forward is not 'fantasizing'