112
submitted 11 months ago by tryptaminev@feddit.de to c/news@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago

You may not want to "check for weapons" a suicide bomber who's just waiting for you to come close to turn you both into tiny chunks of meat.

What you want, is to threaten them with a weapon from a distance, have them take off any clothes that could contain explosives (that includes socks and briefs), and throw them far away from you. They could still hide some C4 up their ass, but that's a risk you might have to take.

The correct thing would be to subsequently provide them with pre-checked clothes, like an orange jumpsuit... so if they didn't, that's where we may agree it starts being abusive (although unfortunately in line with what many countries routinely do to their prisoners).

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
112 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22057 readers
159 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS