668
submitted 11 months ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org -1 points 11 months ago

Client code isn't trusted but no matter what the is one set of data you most trust that comes from the client. Input data. So with input data it can be manipulated that another application calculate out a headshot and sends that input. So even only trusting the client where you have to, you've failed to secure the game fully because you need to trust input data.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 14 points 11 months ago

The first rule of network programming: Never trust the client. How does anti-cheat software work? It trusts the client.

All clientside anti-cheat is fundamentally flawed and broken by design. It doesn't actually prevent cheating it just creates an illusion that it's preventing cheating. The fewer people that believe in that illusion the better off we'll all be.

Besides, you can train AI to play any game via MITM in USB (plug the mouse and keyboard into the Raspberry Pi or similar which then pretends to be a mouse and keyboard to the computer playing the game). The simplest method is to just point a camera at the monitor but there's much lower latency ways where you use some cheap Chinese HDMI decoder/encoders to feed the raw video signal right into the AI.

With methods like that becoming cheaper and easier every day the whole client-side anti-cheat bullshit kinda seems pointless, yeah?

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

We've already established you have to trust the client to some extent in a typical game.

Also do you lock your front door despite people being able to lockpick it? Most people do because it raises the barrier to entry.

[-] msage@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

Do I lock my door? Absolutely.

Do I let strangers into my home? As little as possible.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 0 points 11 months ago

Most people put security cameras in their homes despite them being able to be remotely hacked. Lots of people have an Alexa which could also be seen as letting a stranger in. A lot of people use tools that could be used to compromise their direct use but trust they don't as for things like anti-cheat being malware. That's all FUD. There has not been a single large anti-cheat company known to be sending unneeded or personalized user data.

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
668 points (97.9% liked)

Linux Gaming

15797 readers
32 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS