767
submitted 11 months ago by AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 11 months ago

I like most of you Americans, but I don't wanna share the longest undefended border anymore if that asshole is elected again.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Just tell everyone that Alberta is out of oil. No one is going to invade for the maple syrup, despite it being the nectar of the gods.

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

It will be for the water though.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Yup. NAFTA negotiations are coming up shortly and I bet some of our unused pipelines will be looked at to transport fresh water instead of oil.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago

Which might be a good idea. We've got the pipes sitting there already, connecting the whole continent. Might as well use them.

Before someone says it, yes, you can clean out oil pipelines enough to be used for fresh drinking water. It has been done before.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I dunno that it's a good idea. What would the US be willing to pay for that water? I mean if it's like the pittance water bottlers have been paying, fuck that.

Would we have restrictions on usage, and limits on how much they can take per year? Like there's a large chunk of desert that's growing crops and takes a LOT of water.

Lots of questions to be answered and logistics to look at first.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I don't think it works that way

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago

Why not? It's a free trade agreement and Canada has known for a long time that America would be looking at our freshwater sources because of their mismanagement.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

I don't think you can just look at some old oil pipeline and just decide to run freshwater through it. Pretty sure water isn't the same as oil also I don't think most people want to drink oily water.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

Old oil pipes have been cleaned out before and reused for drinking water.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

I never said it was old. I said it was unused.

Google TMX pipeline.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Fine whatever you convinced me. The TMX pipeline is going to take water

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I didn't say it would for sure. I said it would be discussed.

C'mon. This is a discussion, right?

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Sorry it is just, I can't even with this. Canada is not going to get invaded. There are so many bigger problems to worry about.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It can't possibly be as expensive to invade a country vs running a desalinization system

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

It is if you have a standing army with no other wars to fight.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Citation needed

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

No invading Canada, k? That's not nice.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Hey I am on your side here. There are much easier ways to get tiny bacon and maple syrup

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
767 points (95.4% liked)

News

23301 readers
1211 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS