692
submitted 11 months ago by silverbax@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

Removing children from parents is genocide.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No it's not. The goal must be to exterminate the entirety of a group of people.

Being a cruel fascist piece of shit othering central americans by separating children - parents in detention centers then reuniting most of them isn't genocide.

Forcible transferring of children from Ukraine may potentially violate multiple international law provisions.Footnote5 In its latest report, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine concluded that the transfer and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia constitute violations of Article 147 of the Geneva Convention IV, Articles 74 and 85(4)(b)-(5) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, and Article 8(1) of the Convention of the Rights of the Child.Footnote6 On 17 March 2023, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued warrants of arrest for two individuals in the situation in Ukraine: President Putin and Commissioner L’vova-Belova for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation (under Articles 8(2)(a)(vii) and 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute).Footnote7

International lawyersFootnote8 remain divided on extent to which Russia’s actions in Ukraine constitute genocide under any of the paragraphs of Article IIFootnote9 of the Genocide Convention.Footnote10 Predictably, the fundamental challenge lies with proving dolus specialis, a special intent to physically destroy the group, as required by the genocide definition.Footnote11

https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/forcible-transfer

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10443894231200659

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949/article-50

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623528.2023.2228085

An example where it is but they aren't necessarily killing every one of them?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_genocide

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Wow lol. Just have to be 100% right don't you.

TL;DR.

Article 2 Subsection E: (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Wow lol. Just have to be 100% right don't you.

-_-

I'm glad you know more than international lawyers who specialize in war crimes.

I'm glad you're watering down geopolitical atrocities as some political gotcha instead of trying to understand the truth beyond propaganda sound bytes.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

I'm not saying any of that lmao.

That's literally one of the aspects of genocide as defined by the International Court of the Hague, lol.

Jesus, man. Smoke a joint or learn how to communicate better.

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id -4 points 11 months ago

That can be an element of genocide, but you need more, otherwise we could say that putting kids into foster care is a type of genocide, which is silly.

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

We do and did to native Americans.

Not silly.

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 10 months ago

But that just proves my point that it has to be more than just putting kids into foster care. You wouldn't claim that we're guilty of genocide every time we take a white kid away from their drug-addicted criminal family. There has to be more to it as you yourself have just tacitly acknowledged. It has to be systemic and part of a much larger pattern, just as was the very program vis Native Americans that you mention.

Again, the case remains; simply removing kids from their families is not necessarily grounds for charges of genocide. We need more.

What about this do you not understand?

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

What about the real world events you're arguing about not being related do you not understand?

Do you think there was a single white kid in a cage?

Fuck you're retarded. 🤦🤡

[-] gogogadgetfork@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Chris Hanson arrest them

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Thank you for saying that. I have been making that case for years and no one else has ever agreed with me.

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
692 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1585 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS