291
submitted 9 months ago by Type1@midwest.social to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Read the full decision.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

The argument that could be made is that in most of the rest of the constitution, anything that involves things the president can or can't do explicitly says "the president", so having an extensive list of positions that could be disqualified that doesn't mention the president by name implies that the president isn't included.

It's not a good argument, and I suspect in saner times it would be pretty clear that the intent is that Trump can't run.

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
291 points (98.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7124 readers
685 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS