149
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 25 points 9 months ago

I thought there was a story about them endorsing her, but seems like that definitely didn't exist. I have to concede that they didn't really endorse her.

lol that Snopes is a lib site, so you know their angle for publishing that was ”The GOP is trying to smear her, we swear Hillary's no filthy commie!”

[-] 0x0520@hexbear.net 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They didn't "endorse" her, but they definitely played the lesser of two evils game.

[-] davel@hexbear.net 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Oh yeah Snopes is as bad or worse than NATOpedia.

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
149 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13446 readers
696 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS