714

submitted 1 year ago by alexiascylding@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 66 points 1 year ago

Read up on Reagan and anti-trust. He essentially said that monopolies that resulted in lower prices were good for consumers and that the government would turn a blind eye to them. Hasn't been much change since then.

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

monopolies that resulted in lower prices

IT DOESN'T WORK LIKE THAT DAYO~

When you own the market, you either:

Dictate the price as the sole provider
Are forced to set the price because of your natural monopoly status (as a utility for example; until you stuff the utilities commission or regulatory capture your way into even controlling that)
Have to break up to create competition, release patents, or otherwise be forced to allow competition which leads to a lower cost alternative

I hate the gipper. Fucking cunt, and he can't fucking act either.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He knew. All capitalists know. They don't care, because the goal of capitalism is to profit — therefore profit is the one and only true guiding virtue.