10
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by SLfgb@feddit.nl to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Transcript included in link.

Direct link to YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j_KvkltUW

But even so, I mean, all of this is really irrelevant whether Julian’s a journalist or not. The question is, is Julian accused of journalism? And he is. It is the activity that has been criminalized. Not whether he falls into a category or not. It’s the category of the activity that is being criminalized. Receiving, obtaining, and communicating information to the public.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Shalakushka@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Maybe we would believe he was an impartial whistleblower if he acted like one. But, instead, he acted like a political operative because he is one. He can rot for all I care, maybe Putin can help him.

[-] SLfgb@feddit.nl 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You think this won't impact the work of journalists you like? Think again.

There is no impartiality clause in the 1A. He isn't charged with being biased but with publishing, disseminating truthful information relating to US wars to the public.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
10 points (63.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7166 readers
978 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS