660
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's like saying that the best way to reduce harm from alcohol is to make good strong alcohol cheap so people wouldn't drink eau-de-cologne and denaturate.

Problems with alcohol are not limited to it sometimes being mixed with poison.

Problems with cocaine didn't start with it becoming illegal.

Let's please not talk as if it's normal to consume it.

EDIT: That said, I do sometimes consume alcohol.

[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Let’s please not talk as if it’s normal to consume it.

You'd be surprised.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -5 points 11 months ago

Let's put it this way:

I have a few relatives believing in folk medicine,

a few other relatives believing in good holy USSR unfairly taken from us by evil fate,

a friend believing in esoterics,

a friend and a relative with alcoholism problems,

an acquaintance doing prostitution,

and some acquaintances believing in Russian neo-paganism (very far from actual Russian paganism) with all the history freakery attached,

and probably I'd know some blowing coke if it weren't a thing best kept secret here due to inhumane laws.

That doesn't mean any of those things are normal.

[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

I mean a surprising amount of people use coke recreationally, even those you wouldn't expect it from.

Personally I find it weird how many more people do coke than smoke weed.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago

Personally I find it weird how many more people do coke than smoke weed.

But then even more people consume alcohol, again.

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 11 months ago

Huh. You did a pretty good job destroying your own argument, its not often where I agree with someone before they convince me theyre wrong

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago
[-] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 11 months ago

I think you two define normal differently

Author: normal = acceptable

You: normal = common

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

I meant "acceptably healthy" by "normal".

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago
[-] Allero@lemmy.today 0 points 11 months ago

You brought quite a lot of things together, and I'd say they should be addressed separately if you want to get your message across.

On my part, for example - USSR wasn't holy, but its demise instead of improvement is a giant tradegy that still negatively echoes in the world history.

Someone else would say there's nothing wrong with prostitution, for example.

Some would point out folk medicine is not all entirely wrong even by medical science standards and it becomes a problem when patients ignore science in favor of unproven methods.

And at the end of it, you end up with the comment that is half wrong, and the message poorly sent.

That's just my 2 cents here.

[-] deafboy@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

What the actual fuck are you talking about? The fall of USSR was the second best thing that ever happened to the country I was born in. The first was the end of nazi occupation. Although the negative consequences are still echoing through the entire eastern block.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

As I said - USSR was by no means holy, and some regions, particularly forcefully occupied states of Eastern Europe, gained quite a lot from its downfall.

I'm talking about a more global effect, particularly economic and political pressure USSR exerted on major capitalist powers. It was a simple sign: "the policies we implement do work, your workers can and will demand them, and you better do it or the same revolution will strip you out of all your riches".

Pretty much since its inception, USSR was able to literally shift global policies regarding working conditions and universally available services. It's after severe protests in pre-Nazi Germany and USSR that all major powers suddenly decided to shorten the work day from 10-12 hours to 8, then from 6 days a week to 5, introduced (except for US) full universal healthcare and higher edication, and many more policies we take for granted today.

Then, when USSR went into its demise, the improvements stopped. The income inequality rose significantly in most major economies, going straight up through the roof in the US, UK, Canada and Germany. Same happened to the post-Soviet countries themselves, even though it has been at first greatly compensated by the sheer volume of money coming from foreign investors. Social services started to receive less funding, and population is more in debt than ever.

If anything, USSR was the force that kept major powers in check and didn't allow capitalism to do what it does best - concentrate wealth, population be damned. I know capitalism can look like magic when your country has got significant economic boost in living memory, but global trends show a very different picture.

[-] deafboy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It’s after severe protests in pre-Nazi Germany and USSR that all major powers suddenly decided to shorten the work day from 10-12 hours to 8

Some industries in the west has been adopting the 10 or 8 hour working day even before the soviet union has existed. And this is going to be only my personal speculations, but as the nature of the work itself has been changing over time, so did the time requirements.

from 6 days a week to 5

It's funny that you mention that, because one thing that I distinctly remember from what my parents and grandparents has been telling me about the previous regime was something called "working saturday of honor", when the workers were mandated to come work an extra day. Some of them were to compensate for the state holidays, some just to ramp up the productivity.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago

On my part, for example - USSR wasn’t holy, but its demise instead of improvement is a giant tradegy that still negatively echoes in the world history.

I agree, but that's not the position I described.

Someone else would say there’s nothing wrong with prostitution, for example.

Definitely better than alcoholism.

Some would point out folk medicine is not all entirely wrong even by medical science standards and it becomes a problem when patients ignore science in favor of unproven methods.

The latter is what I meant exactly.

And at the end of it, you end up with the comment that is half wrong, and the message poorly sent.

That depends on reader's interpretation, so you are basically ascribing your own choices to me. If something isn't clear, it doesn't mean you can pick the wrong variant and ascribe it to author of that comment. It just means you can ask.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

My point wasn't about the content of statements, but about how such wide statements going way beyond original question will inevitably cause conflict and will drive your point across less effectively.

But then, that's just my opinion

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

Ah, well, it wasn't my intention to persuade anyone or drive anyone to my side.

[-] sylverstream@lemmy.nz 4 points 11 months ago

Problems with alcohol are not limited to it sometimes being mixed with poison.

Alcohol IS a poison...

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago

Yes, I meant dedicated poison.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
660 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39112 readers
2438 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS