149
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Rentlar@lemmy.ca to c/patientgamers@sh.itjust.works

8AM PT, 11AM ET.

Can't beat the price of free. No parts of the game are missing, just for all of you patient folks.

Quick note: It is a remaster of the original game with the base game and the DLC expansions that were released for it, visual updates and a higher level cap and possible other tweaks. Some reports of stuttering and poor performance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago

It's even worse when you're old enough to remember the same kind of people that were complaining about Valve creating Steam and forcing them to download it in order to play their games and then complaining that non-Valve games were starting to depend on having Steam installed and having to download part of the game at a time when bandwidth sucked... The same kind of people were saying they would forever boycott Steam but today they're made that someone tried to break the status quo again.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Huh, I actually never used Steam until it came to Linux. I switched back in 2010 or so, and before that I either downloaded games directly from the dev or bought disks.

I don't understand what was wrong with that model. I remember buying Minecraft directly from the website back in 2012 or so, and I did the same with Factorio (2014?). I remember playing Starcraft 2 with its own launcher, which again I got through the website. The same is true for League of Legends.

I don't get why everything has to be through some launcher, though I do appreciate what Steam is doing for the Linux community, so they have earned my business (if it wasn't for Steam, I wouldn't play nearly as many games). But from an overall gaming perspective, I agree that having such a dominant platform isn't good, and I would probably buy from other stores if they offered a decent experience, but I'm not going to jump through hoops to play games.

[-] kick_out_the_jams@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

non-Valve games were starting to depend on having Steam installed

The problem was/is their policy of allowing the non-Valve games to also require their own storefront launcher alongside Steam.

There was that one dark period of "Games For Windows Live" on Steam, but those issues are pretty rare nowadays.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -2 points 11 months ago

That's also an issue, but them becoming the default provider and having such a huge market share isn't something that players should be happy about, they might be managed by someone that cares about players but Gaben could die tomorrow and get replaced by someone that doesn't. Competition should be celebrated even if it's not perfect.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Competition needs to do better than simply existing to be celebrated.

If I open a storefront that costs twice as much as Steam with none of the features you wouldn't support it just because "it's competition".

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -4 points 11 months ago

I would certainly encourage the effort but tell you that you need to do better on pricing

this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
149 points (85.3% liked)

Patient Gamers

10292 readers
12 users here now

A gaming community free from the hype and oversaturation of current releases, catering to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. Whether it's price, waiting for bugs/issues to be patched, DLC to be released, don't meet the system requirements, or just haven't had the time to keep up with the latest releases.

^(placeholder)^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS