view the rest of the comments
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
What were they doing the past few months? Learning English?
Flying actually requires a lot of training because if the person flying dies all that training was for nothing and an expensive jet is lost to boot.
It's one of those professions where it's just not financially feasible to half ass it (for the ones funding)
I'm not with that person, but I'm surprised 'learning English' was repeated by a journo a couple of times with Ukraine probably having lots of speakers due to long eurointegration talks, many of them working in EU or online. That's a specific field, and you need a close to zero response time like a native, but yet, it's put on the same level as training them as military pilots and it indeed sounded off. It makes me think they didn't have many info on interesting specifics of how these pilots learnt in a flight school and tried to fill a word counter, or had a hangover, or were an AI.
The trainees were already experienced pilots in Ukrainian aircraft though, they couldn't just pick from a giant pool of people that already knew English
As of 2 days ago (at least when it became publicly known), there are f16s being flown by Ukrainians in Ukraine. So clearly other groups could train faster
Edit: adding more info below
A Danish military analyst who works for their military and specialists in the Ukraine war hypotheses that f16s is the most likely reason for the multiple Russian fighter planes shot down in recent days
https://youtu.be/-NdIoseN6HM?si=__O7Et_i6pu9MXkK
And Ukraine war update channels are starting to share the news
https://youtu.be/M_uhfHnuKgw?si=Xy4_s0FWKk_AGMb6
Also ISW published this 2 weeks ago:
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-december-9-2023
And Newsweek reported weeks ago that the first batch of 5 f16s from the Netherlands had already arrived at the training centre in Romania, and that the f16s from Belgium would arrive in Ukraine in march or April
https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-receives-major-update-f-16s-1841683
The Netherlands it seems has fast tracked the process, to make sure the f16s are delivered before the new far right leader gets into power after winning the recent Dutch election
Is the source for this www.pulledoutofyourass.com or?
No, a Danish military analyst who works for their military and specialists in the Ukraine war hypotheses that f16s is the most likely reason for the multiple Russian fighter planes shot down in recent days
https://youtu.be/-NdIoseN6HM?si=__O7Et_i6pu9MXkK
And Ukraine war update channels are starting to share the news
https://youtu.be/M_uhfHnuKgw?si=Xy4_s0FWKk_AGMb6
Also ISW published this 2 weeks ago:
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-december-9-2023
And Newsweek reported weeks ago that the first batch of 5 f16s from the Netherlands had already arrived at the training centre in Romania, and that the f16s from Belgium would arrive in Ukraine in march or April
https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-receives-major-update-f-16s-1841683
The Netherlands it seems has fast tracked the process, to make sure the f16s are delivered before the new far right leader gets into power after winning the recent Dutch election
So no official statements or evidence yet (there'd likely be civilian footage even), just youtuber speculation.
Why would there be an official statement immediately when they receive them? They'd remove the chance for catching russian planes by surprise.
And you say "YouTuber speculation", do you mean to say "Advisor to the Danish military speculates" ... Which is a very different thing
I'll clarify, I'm not saying it's impossible that F16 are already shooting shit down there these past days. The storm shadow was also officially announced practically at the same time it already was pulverising vatniks. I'm just saying there's no solid proof yet that this is the case. Yes, the Danish advisor is still currently speculating even if he turns out to be correct.
Newsweek now is referencing an anonymous US military source that Ukraine "likely" already has received f-16s
https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-f16-russia-fighter-jets-crimea-su34-1855709
Think it's safe to assume at this point that they're not there yet, unfortunately.
Agreed
Okay fair, then we're in agreeance