273
submitted 11 months ago by pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Well known KDE developer Nate Graham is out with a blog post today outlining his latest Wayland thoughts, how X11 is a bad platform, and the recent topic of "Wayland breaking everything" isn't really accurate.

"In this context, “breaking everything” is another perhaps less accurate way of saying “not everything is fully ported yet”. This porting is necessary because Wayland is designed to target a future that doesn’t include 100% drop-in compatibility with everything we did in the past, because it turns out that a lot of those things don’t make sense anymore. For the ones that do, a compatibility layer (XWayland) is already provided, and anything needing deeper system integration generally has a path forward (Portals and Wayland protocols and PipeWire) or is being actively worked on. It’s all happening!"

Nate's Original Blog Post

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] superbirra@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

yeah but the point is why bother? :) especially if I wouldn't notice differences...

[-] S410@kbin.social 17 points 11 months ago

To provide features that Xorg can't.
If you don't need features like fractional scaling, VRR, touchscreen gestures, etc. you won't notice a difference.
People who do use those, will. Because for them, those features would be missing or not complete on Xorg.

[-] superbirra@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

mmmh, I bet I will not notice any difference also if I don't do shit and keep whatever is working until the day I'll have to switch because my distro drops the packages 🤷🏼

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 months ago

Because it fixes all the issues I had with X. Everything runs a bit faster and is smoother plus inputs behave like they should.

[-] superbirra@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

sorry, my rhetorical question was obviously intended as why I should bother. I don't see any value in stopping you doing whatever you think is better for you, in fact it is exactly what annoys me the most :)

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

why I should bother

Bother to do what? As you said, when your distro switches you go with it and notice no difference. You don't have to bother to do anything.

[-] superbirra@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago
[-] bastion@feddit.nl 3 points 11 months ago

The point of open source is kinda that you have the freedom to do as you will.

The point of packaged distros is so that you don't have to do too much.

Do as you will, brother, do as you will.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 months ago

Well Xorg is pretty much unmaintained and is on its death bed. Modern hardware and software are slowly favoring Wayland due to it being much simpler by design.

[-] superbirra@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

well, everything which I use runs well on xorg, and I'd need to change relevant parts of my daily stack in order to use wayland sooo ... :)

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
273 points (98.2% liked)

Linux

48334 readers
671 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS