121
Stalwart v0.5.0 (stalw.art)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Parachute4196@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Elevating Performance and Flexibility

We are excited to announce the release of Stalwart Mail Server v0.5.0. As we approach the end of the year, this significant update marks a major advancement in our journey to provide a robust, efficient, and versatile mail server solution. This latest version incorporates a range of performance enhancements, storage layer improvements, and new features, designed to elevate your email server experience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If the VPS allows email ports to be open.

Then deal with your email going to spam most of the time because you’re domain/IP is so new and not “warmed up” that email systems think it’s all spam.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it seems like the latter option is the obvious answer. It's an awful lot of work you still have to pay for. I'd rather just pay someone to offer me secure email and not harvest my information.

[-] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In my experience, this is nothing more than an urban legend at this point. There are great standards, like DMARC, DKIM, SPF, proper reverse DNS and more, that are much more reliable and are actually used by major mail servers. Pick a free service that scans the publicly visible parts of your email server and one that accepts an email that you send to them and generates a report. Make sure all checks are green. After an initial day of two of getting it right, I've never had trouble with any provider accepting mail and the ongoing maintenance is very low.

Milage may vary with an unknown domain and large email volumes or suspicious contents, though.

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

There are literally RBLs in use by many major mail providers that just contain all dynamic IPs. There are others that block entire subnets used by VPSs at certain hosters. In neither of those you can remove your IP yourself (unlike the ones that list individual IPs because of that IP's reputation).

[-] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Weird, I've never had problems over the past 15 years or so and I've been using VPS servers exclusively. Maybe my providers were reputable enough.

I realize my evidence is only anecdotal, but that's why I started "in my experience". Also, common blacklists are checked by the services I mentioned.

[-] Chobbes@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

For what it’s worth I also haven’t had any problems. Maybe we’re just lucky, though.

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
121 points (99.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40153 readers
257 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS