147
submitted 10 months ago by Addition@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Here's a couple examples from my life:

  1. Safety Razor. I get a better shave and it's like $15 for 100 razor blades, which lasts me a couple years. Way way way better than the disposable multi-blade Gillette things, which sell 5 heads for $20.

  2. Handkerchiefs. I am prone to allergies, so instead of constantly buying disposable tissues, we now have a stack of handkerchiefs that can just be used a few times and then thrown in the wash. This has also saved me loads.

What about you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nemo@midwest.social 0 points 10 months ago

The real question is, can you afford not to?

[-] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

Cheapest city with moderately decent public transit is probably Washington DC. With an average home price comparable to the one I live in without public transit of about $600,000 more than my current home. Even if I didn't own my truck outright (8 years old, 58k miles) and the price of gasoline doubled, my payback period for 100% free public transit is greater than infinity with a 5% cost of money calculated in.

It's a bit like solar. I've run the numbers, and had others run the numbers, and the conclusion is that it would require replacing solar panels twice before I made back my investment, even with a 0% loan for the panels and install.

I'd love to be part of it. I'd love to have European-style public transit. Even in the few places where viable public transit exists in the US, it's not affordable to move to those places. shrug

[-] Nemo@midwest.social -1 points 10 months ago

Cheapest city with decent pubtrans is almost certainly Chicago, where you can still buy a SFH for under 200K pretty easily.

The weasel words in your reply are "comparable to the one I live in". Of course dense areas have the best transit, and if course homes and especially lot sizes are smaller in dense areas, and prohibitively expensive at the scale of lots you see in less urbanized areas. It's ridiculous to compare.

The fact is, the large homes far away from city centers are heavily subsidized by the convenience of personal automotives. If we're going to unravel car dependency or even the current high level of car incentivization we currently experience, the true cost of that lifestyle will be shown to be much higher.

this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
147 points (97.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43859 readers
1692 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS