863
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by SuperSpaceFan@lemmy.ca to c/workreform@lemmy.world

Paywall-free link: https://archive.is/eV7A5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 109 points 11 months ago

I thought the point was to get people to resign so they didn't have to pay severance?

[-] SuperSpaceFan@lemmy.ca 33 points 11 months ago

My company had that same attitude when they announced full RTO. They were then faced with extremely high turnover for a sustained period. They had trouble hiring people to fulfill the constant merry-go-round of job openings and that negatively impacted productivity. So they backed off from full RTO and moved to a hybrid model instead.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Hybrid model is such a stupid fucking compromise. Come in when a scrum or meeting is needed. Leave everyone else the fuck alone if they're hitting targets.

[-] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

It also limits hiring/job pools because you still need to live close enough to come in to the office. May as well be a full office job then. Hybrid is not a compromise to remote.

[-] SuperSpaceFan@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

I agree. I would prefer full remote.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 30 points 11 months ago

Maybe enough people resigned.

this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
863 points (96.9% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
107 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS