78
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by autismdragon@hexbear.net to c/games@hexbear.net

This discourse was going around twitter today apparently and im curious takes from here.

Which is it for you?

For me i prefer playersexuality. I want to be able to romance any romance option regardless of my charachters gender. I dont want to be stuck with only Arcade Gannon if i want to do m/m

I agree that sexuality can be important to a charachter. But if you wanna do that, seems like the charachter can just not be a romance option.

That said. In RPGs devs can do what they want. You want a charachter to be monosexual and a romance option, have at it. (Unless theyre all straight, then fuck you).

I do kinda hate what The Sims did by adding monosexuality. Felt like such a virtue signal that made the game less fun. All Sims being pansexual was always more fun for me. Especially since i usually play that game as a pansexual slut. Unless i decide my player Sim is mono, but thats on the player's end.

Monosexual townies in the Sims should at least be optional (is it? Idk havent played Sims 4 since this update).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] flan@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

No romance options because romance in games is cringe

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

But... I want to make girls love other girls :(

Also ngl its cringe af and heteronormative but the matchmaking in recent Fire Embelms is fun.

this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
78 points (100.0% liked)

games

20523 readers
124 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS