This discourse was going around twitter today apparently and im curious takes from here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f93f0/f93f0ed7a61239c2514f341764f3603cb60b5f2f" alt=""
Which is it for you?
For me i prefer playersexuality. I want to be able to romance any romance option regardless of my charachters gender. I dont want to be stuck with only Arcade Gannon if i want to do m/m
I agree that sexuality can be important to a charachter. But if you wanna do that, seems like the charachter can just not be a romance option.
That said. In RPGs devs can do what they want. You want a charachter to be monosexual and a romance option, have at it. (Unless theyre all straight, then fuck you).
I do kinda hate what The Sims did by adding monosexuality. Felt like such a virtue signal that made the game less fun. All Sims being pansexual was always more fun for me. Especially since i usually play that game as a pansexual slut. Unless i decide my player Sim is mono, but thats on the player's end.
Monosexual townies in the Sims should at least be optional (is it? Idk havent played Sims 4 since this update).
The first item on the bitinerary is making everyone
and
in videogames.
Why stop at videogamesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/606d6/606d6058656057ab8bf64f269e133b8b8da5c0b8" alt="emoji sicko-jammin sicko-jammin"
Woah, like boardgames?
Like games of skill. That's right let's queer the casinodata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc6f4/dc6f43f3153c9eabcc96d62a4a1f8c673978c554" alt="emoji party-sicko party-sicko"