254
submitted 2 years ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

The justices will review a decision by the Colorado Supreme Court that said Trump could be barred from the Republican primary ballot in that state, but the U.S. Supreme Court ruling is likely to have national repercussions, potentially setting guidelines that would determine how every other state would handle the issue.

The brief order said the case would be argued on an accelerated schedule on Feb. 8, indicating that a ruling will follow soon after.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 100 points 2 years ago

"There is also the possibility that if Trump is kicked off the ballot, Republicans could take retaliatory action by doing the same to President Joe Biden. Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has already floated such a move."

I wonder that excuse they'll dream up to try to pull this off.

[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago

They're not expecting to actually pull it off, it's just posturing for their dumbfuck base.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Those far rights can't care less about reasons.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

That’s one of the reasons they love religion. All you gotta do is claim that the other side is EVIL. No logic, proof, or accountability necessary.

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The one I've heard floated is not securing the border to their satisfaction somehow constitutes insurrection and since a lot of people have argued there doesn't have to be any conviction or factual determination by a court it would stick just as well as the Jan 6th stuff against Trump.

[-] Quasari@programming.dev 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That just means every member of congress is an insurrectionist because they have just as much or more power to change that.

It is not insurrection in either todays definition or the 14ths contemporary definition, and that would be slapped down.

[-] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

A brand new congress? I could get behind that.

[-] yardy_sardley@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

Republicans leafing through The Sovereign Citizen's Guide to Vexatious Litigation for ideas as we speak

[-] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Hunter's laptop, Hillary's emails and Obama's tan suit.

[-] Rusticus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago
[-] swab148@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago

Buttery males with freeze peaches

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

If we enforce the law it might be enforced badly. Is a pretty bad argument.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It's a bad argument to consider not enforcing the law, but it's not an incorrect statement. Republicans responded to the impeachment of Trump by continously trying to impeach Biden. They're responding to the insurrection by pointing at things dems do and yelling insurrection.

It's dumb and incorrect, but it's pretty effective at diluting the seriousness of those particular actions to their own voter base. You could argue that that's the point.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

And how is their trying going? Did they pull it off yet? They control the house and have such for nearly two years.

It’s dumb and incorrect, but it’s pretty effective at diluting the seriousness of those particular actions to their own voter base. You could argue that that’s the point.

Citation needed. I want you to show that polling has gone up for them as a result of their lackluster efforts.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I don't need to show you statistics to shed light on their intent. It's not hard to figure out what they're doing. It's also not hard to see that what they're doing is damage control. The result of that would be keeping their polls from going down, not making them go up. You can't prove a negative, so I don't know what you want me to do.

As far as diluting the seriousness of what they've done, go turn on fox news. They blast Biden's "insurrection" and impeachment "proceedings" 24/7. Do you need more proof than that?

Lastly, if you're trying to defend your original statement, you're preaching to the choir here. You don't have to be an asshole about it. It's a bit asinine to assert that they aren't doing it with intent.

[-] rivermonster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Nobody wants Texassistan in the union, not even Texass. Heh.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

The only thing I have heard is that anyone who supported the BLM movement during the rioting is essentially supporting anti american values thus insurrection. I have heard this from a few separate places.

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Trump being disqualified from running in Colorado and Biden being disqualified from running in Texas are not equally important in the election.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
254 points (97.0% liked)

News

35714 readers
867 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS