238
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
238 points (97.6% liked)
science
14595 readers
410 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.
2024-11-11
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sheesh.
Do we really need more research on this? Holy shit.
Yes we do, science is better than gut feelings. Repetitive science is also necessary, reconfirming things we know is important, just because we've known something for a long time doesn't mean its correct
Science has proven many times that ingesting microplastics is bad. They even found they can cross the blood brain barrier.
What we need now is to take action to stop this.
The study is about nanoplastics which are bigger. Not that you're wrong since nanoplastics also cross the blood brain barrier (in fish), we just don't know if they have any adverse effects on humans yet.
They probably do, but I'm not a biologist. They may have no adverse effects other than piling up at the levels we are currently consuming. The adverse effects are still being studied:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9026096/
So to reiterate, there is no proof that the nanoplastics are bad, so we still need studies
Yes, for the same reason that mercury in vaccines isn't a threat because it's under the LD50.
Certain things are only an issue when they are in a specific concentration.
Scientists actually studying the issue:
"Not sure. We studying the issue."
Lemmy:
"But I FEEL it's harmful! I've done my research!"
Antivaxxer by any chance? Because you're tracking the same thought process.
Whenever something like this comes up, of which I'm ignorant, I ask myself, "By what mechanisms could this be true or false? How would that work?"
Your turn.
Wow man. I wrote, "Sheesh."
And you got AAAAAALLLL this:
Yeah, I'll pass.
Let's fight over nothing but my assumptions and preconceptions!
Lmao...
"We don't know yet", and "No" are two very different answers.
Antivaxxers interpret "No [not harmful]" to mean "Yes [harmful]".
Completely unrelated.