122

This console generation seems skippable (lemm.ee)

submitted 10 months ago by delitomatoes@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world

86 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've never skipped a console gen starting from Super NES, PS1 through 4 plus the Switch Oled 5 years after launch of the OG Switch

It seems like exclusives are rarer now with Sony and Xbox pushing games to PC and Nintendo spending resources on remasters. COVID made it incredibly difficult to own a PS5 and they have some disappointing exclusives as well

What do you think? Any reason to own a PS5 or PS5 pro?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

It's worth it just for my PS4 library not punishing me with a ten minute wait every time I die. The loading entirely changes the experience and enables punishing gameplay to be far less frustrating, in the same way Celeste can have harder sequences and be less annoying than something like Mario at the same time.

But the controller features are insane as well.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

That was also my experience playing XCOM on a PS3 and then on a PC. It was almost like a whole new game.

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

An SSD on PC is definitely a step up from anything before this gen.

This gen (at least PS5, which leans hard into the tech with hardware decompression on top of the silly raw speed of the drives) is better than PC, though (for now). The hardware you're buying now can do pretty much everything the PS5 hardware can, but because the software stack to use it isn't the same and universal, there's definitely more loads. It's similar to how PS4 games load fast (especially compared to on the actual PS4), but get blown out of the water by PS5 games. I die in Horizon: Zero Dawn, it's 5-10 seconds. Which is fine. But I die in Forbidden West, which is prettier and has more complexity (mechanically and the environment) and it's maybe a second.