143
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Egon@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Disclaimer: I adore my anarchist comrades and I don't write for a newspaper, I have in fact never even read one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Egon@hexbear.net 52 points 10 months ago

I just find it funny how the sectarianism rule isn't really a thing when it comes to trots.

[-] SteamedHamberder@hexbear.net 47 points 10 months ago

:groundskeeper-Willie: Tankies and trots are natural enemies. Like socdems and trots. Or anarchists and trots. Or MLs and trots. Or trots and other trots.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 30 points 10 months ago

Trots sound like a contentious people

[-] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 37 points 10 months ago
[-] Lucien@hexbear.net 21 points 10 months ago
[-] Egon@hexbear.net 17 points 10 months ago

At this point we're past the 100's I think

[-] star_wraith@hexbear.net 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You know what, I think you are right. I don’t know any Trots personally but there are plenty of them out there IRL that are cool and good (Michael Hudson and China Mieville come to mind). I’ve also read individual Trots as they often have good article and essays. They run the world’s best website, marxists.org; and IIRC they keep International Publishers going.

I feel similar about leftcoms (doubt we have any here, either). Dunk on some takes they might have, maybe allow for ACTUAL, thoughtful critique of positions, too. But no uncharitable generalizations.

I would love the rule to be that there’s no ripping on any genuine leftist movement in general, only ripping on specific takes by individuals.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah this site is kinda weird about trots. I know trots that do way more than anarchists and have better takes and vice versa. Most ML's I know are armchair socialists but that's not reason to dunk on every ML.

Some people on here think that there's some specific tendency that, if they subscribe to, will push the socialism button.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You know what, I think you are right. I don’t know any Trots personally but there are plenty of them out there IRL that are cool and good

Cool and good until you say the word China and then the conversation turns into a complete shitshow.

Also every single article they have ever written has something in it about "stalinists". It is in fact the only way to tell something was written by a trot compared to any other ideological branch.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 5 points 10 months ago

How much does that matter outside internet shitposting?

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not too much really, the downside is that they actively reinforce a lot of anti-communist stuff by agreeing with the right on it.

Socialist Appeal is also kind of cult-ey. I worry that their methods end up turning off a lot of the young student crowd that they burn through who get a bad taste for "organising" because all they do is rock up to events organised by other people, set up all their highly visible branding to make themselves look associated with it and then sell newspapers and shit. Their member turnover is extremely high. But that's just my experience with one specific group of trots I suppose and might not be the case for all of them, but it's a big group here.

The old Labour Militant members are fucking good organisers though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You know what, I think you are right. I don’t know any Trots personally

Shows

I feel similar about leftcoms

Shows

[-] Aryuproudomenowdaddy@hexbear.net 24 points 10 months ago

I'd be surprised if there are any on Hexbear to offend tbh.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They're too busy writing newspapers that no one will read.
That shouldn't really be an issue though since all the ml's are busy creating new parties (some guy in the last one thinks we should implement urban farms after the revolution, but my group thinks it's important to use the implementation of urban farms as a step of taking away power from the landholding class before the inevitable revolution)
And the anarchists are of course busy... Meeting in councils talking about how they should structure a council without a vote? Building parallel power structures (smoke weed with my friends)? Playing in a kindergarten? I dunno what the leftist stereotype of anarchists are.

[-] JuryNullification@hexbear.net 6 points 10 months ago

Feeding vegan food to the unhoused and then doing drugs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 16 points 10 months ago

Yeah but statistically there have to be a lot of us former trots around

[-] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm generally okay with Trots but my god, the articles they put out can be really grating sometimes. Keep them on track and they can tell you a dozen interesting things about current-day struggles and labour movements. But let them stray a little and they'll just talk about how workers need to form their own rank-and-file movements free of collaborationist union leadership (which like, sure I guess, but union membership and vibrancy isn't exactly thriving throughout the world right now and I just don't think unions can have the same degree of power under financial capitalism that has exported industry to other countries so there's less means of production to even seize), and how Stalinists are destroying every good thing on the planet, and how China is secretly an even worse imperialist than America. I've spent nearly two years reading the stuff they put out and I feel like it would be pretty easy to set up an AI script to just write a solid third of their articles for them, so I hope they're getting in on that to save themselves some effort on the weekly China Bad article so they can focus on the better stuff that I know they can and do regularly write.

I appreciate that the online versions of most left-wing ideologies tend to spend a lot of time in the past for a variety of reasons - things seemed much more dynamic and changeable back then; the world is very difficult to understand and predict right now in anything but general trajectories; arguing online about past events is easier than going outside and actually doing stuff; most of the OG thinkers that you have to read to understand their works happened to be about a century or so ago and there's not a ton of big English-language communist works nowadays; etc - but of all the major left ideologies, Trots seem to be the ones who spend the most time in the past, and with ways of organizing and disseminating information that are built on the assumptions of a world that no longer really exists. They're kind of like the grandpas of the left. I can't really hate or even really dislike them that much, but you're not expecting a lot of energy and movement in that sphere compared to say, the still-surviving ML countries, or the vibrant and energetic anarchist sphere.

[-] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 15 points 10 months ago

It's really ONLY a thing for anarchists, I used to call it the "be nice to anarchists" rule.

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 13 points 10 months ago

i think if there was a trot who really complained we'd probably stop, but they simply are not dedicated enough to posting to be on here

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 13 points 10 months ago

it's kind of hard when i genuinely came across a trotskyist pamphlet this week

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 14 points 10 months ago

They do be writing newspapers. I really don't get it, they should be influencers (Instagram pages are the modern pamphlet)

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 19 points 10 months ago

Showing my butthole to everyone to benefit the mass line

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

Sexworkers are, no bullshit, consistently the most radical people I know with the best politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

One of the things with trots is that they're a bit too committed to book worship, and don't translate the fact that influencing via media in the 19th century is not the same thing as influencing via media in the 21st century. You're absolutely right that the modern newspaper is no longer an actual newspaper.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 10 points 10 months ago

They kind of strike me as tech-priests from 40k lol. Dogmatic adherents to doctrine no longer useful or relevant, though at times still helpful and insightful

[-] JuryNullification@hexbear.net 10 points 10 months ago

TFW you read “What is to be Done?” and come away with “I must start a newspaper!”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 5 points 10 months ago

I don't directly have a problem with individual SAlt members in Australia, but they have a problem with me since I say too many nice things about the USSR (or even Cuba) so they've stopped trying to recruit me or sell me newspapers. That said, I've heard pretty sketchy things from ex-SAlt members about the internal social dynamics (which isn't unique to them, it happens a lot in any closed off org/group with a few older powerful members and a lot of university students).

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
143 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13558 readers
686 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS