143
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Egon@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Disclaimer: I adore my anarchist comrades and I don't write for a newspaper, I have in fact never even read one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 5 points 10 months ago

Basically I'm saying that the people in here saying that deep theoretical discussions between tendencies are allowed are kind of full of it and not paying attention, the opposite is true. All that is allowed if very shallow joking conversations. The more deep and truthful your critique, the harder it is to wriggle out of, the more likely you are to get banned for it because the litmus test for banning is based on outrage from the offended party and not any objective metric, and truthful critiques cause more outrage and offense.

Damn you really summed up my feelings on it

[-] voight@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago

They better ban me too if they take Zed bc I need to get back to the point where we're arguing constructively again

[-] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago

I'm curious why their comment got deleted. They weren't really doing a sectarianism, just pointing out how the sectarianism rule ends up working around here. What he said was totally accurate.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
143 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13556 readers
956 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS