130
submitted 10 months ago by intelshill@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Does that include Iranian ships?

[-] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Yes it does. Ships of any nation have a right to transit international waters.

When Iranian ships (or ships of any nation, really) engage in acts of privacy, then they open themselves up to the consequences, whatever those may be.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The US has been seizing non-Iranian ships in international waters that it claims are carrying Iranian oil. It has been doing this long before the current unpleasantness.

The country engaging in the act of piracy is the US.

Also, the Bab Al-Mandreb straight is the territorial waters of Yemen, Eritrea and Djibouti. It is not international waters.

[-] Womble@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

Yes they do. I presume from your stance you are in favour of the US seizing or sinking Iranian ships when they are in waters the US controls just like the Houthis are attempting to do?

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

So then you believe international waters are waters that America controls?

[-] Womble@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

I'm confused, do you think international waters, like shipping lanes leaving the Red sea, are a thing or do you believe might makes right and if you can exert force you control it? If the the former then the US and the Houthis are both in the wrong, if the latter then they are both fine. So which is it?

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

The Bab Al-Mandreb straight is not international waters. It is the territorial waters of Yemen, Eritrea, and Djibouti.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
130 points (92.8% liked)

World News

32317 readers
551 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS