view the rest of the comments
Digital Bioacoustics
Welcome to c/DigitalBioacoustics, a unique niche in the vast universe of online forums and digital communities. At its core, bioacoustics is the study of sound in and from living organisms, an intriguing intersection of biology and acoustics. Digital bioacoustics, an extension of this field, involves using technology to capture, analyze, and interpret these biological sounds. This community is dedicated to exploring these fascinating aspects of nature through a digital lens.
As you delve into c/DigitalBioacoustics, you'll notice it's not just another technical forum. This space transcends the usual drone of server rooms or the monotonous tap-tap of keyboards. Here, members engage in a unique fusion of natural wonders and technological prowess. Imagine a world where the rustling of leaves, the chirping of birds, and the mysterious calls of nocturnal creatures meet the precision of digital recording and analysis.
Within this domain, we, the participants, become both observers and participants in an intricate dance. Our mission is to unravel the mysteries of nature's soundtrack, decoding the language of the wild through the lens of science. This journey is not just about data and graphs; it's about connecting with the primal rhythm of life itself.
As you venture deeper, the poetic essence of our community unfolds. Nature's raw concert, from the powerful songs of mating calls to the subtle whispers of predator and prey, creates a tapestry of sounds. We juxtapose these organic melodies with the mechanical beeps and buzzes of our equipment, a reminder of the constant interplay between the natural world and our quest to understand it.
Our community embodies the spirit of curious scientists and nature enthusiasts alike, all drawn to the mystery and majesty of the natural world. In this symphonic melding of science and nature, we discover not just answers, but also new questions and a deeper appreciation for the complex beauty of our planet.
c/DigitalBioacoustics is more than a mere digital gathering place. It's a living, breathing symphony of stories, each note a discovery, each pause a moment of reflection. Here, we celebrate the intricate dance of nature and technology, the joy of discovery, and the enduring quest for understanding in a world filled with both harmony and dissonance.
For those brave enough to explore its depths, c/DigitalBioacoustics offers a journey like no other: a melding of science and art, a discovery of nature's secrets, and a celebration of the eternal dance between the wild and the wired.
Related communities:
https://lemmy.world/c/awwnverts
https://lemmy.world/c/bats
!biology@mander.xyz
https://lemmy.world/c/birding
https://lemmy.world/c/capybara
https://lemmy.world/c/jellyfish
https://lemmy.world/c/nature
!open_source_ecology@slrpnk.net
https://lemmy.world/c/opossums
https://lemmy.world/c/raccoons
https://lemmy.world/c/skunks
https://lemmy.world/c/whales
Please let me know if you know of any other related communities or any other links I should add.
Great read, thank you for sharing!
Some of these I had heard of, but many were new to me.
I particularly enjoyed Angry Cucumber Catapult Monkey and the Hungry Monkey Prostitute. ๐
I feel most of us have seen animals dream or get scared by something. It amazes me that some people think nothing goes on in their heads. They come from a harsher world than we do and are either more self or group reliant than most of us, so why would they not be able to process information and develop culture and individual personalities?
Animals are amazing!
Yeah, I agree, it sure is a great read! All the credit goes to GONADS125@lemmy.world , they are the one that wrote it and shared it in a comment in an old thread. I figured it definetly warranted its own post.
So far as the mystery as to why so many people don't seem to want to consider that maybe animals have their own inner worlds, I recently heard about a relevant study. They asked people a bunch of questions, then said they would be getting them a snack, meanwhile they continue answering questions. Some of those questions were about how they perceived the complexity of mind of animals. Some people had been told they would be getting apples, and others were told they would be getting beef jerky. The apple group was more likely to perceive animals as having more complex inner worlds than the jerky group. This is from memory, so maybe some details are off, but the main idea is there.
I don't know how big a part it plays, but maybe people eating animals so much plays into their unability to see them as having complex conciousness. It's a very complex issue, but maybe this is one piece of the puzzle.
That's interesting.. Seems like the jerky group may have been rationalizing to insulate themselves from guilt. It's harder to eat meat if you think about it like you are eating a being. It's easier to eat if you dissociate meat from its source.
Wonder if that was a conscious or unconscious thought process in the participants in the study.
Here is the video where I heard about the study. It's a good video, but the relevant part is towards the end, 20:30. It would be interesting if to know if they asked any followup questions afterwards to find out if the jerky had occured to them when they were judging the minds in the questions.