120
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

North Korea fired a suspected intermediate-range ballistic missile toward the sea on Sunday, South Korea’s military said, two months after the North claimed to have tested engines for a new harder-to-detect missile capable of striking distant U.S. targets in the region.

The launch was the North’s first this year. Experts say North Korea could ramp up its provocative missile tests as a way to influence the results of South Korea’s parliamentary elections in April and the U.S. presidential election in November.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago
[-] hark@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Hiroshima and Nagasaki

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

He means nukes

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Please tell me how many countries have used nuclear weapons, and how many countries have invaded other countries with nuclear weapons.

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

So you're suggesting that North Korea is demonstrating its ballistic missiles solely in order to deter the United States from unilaterally launching an unprovoked surprise nuclear strike against North Korea. ...

Okay.

Let's talk about this, I guess.

In the universe in which the US launches an unprovoked surprise nuclear attack against North Korea, I'd like to think we could all agree that the rest of the world, including other nuclear powers, would be united in retaliating, NK ballistic missiles or not. Sure, it's not impossible that the US government could become irrational, but that's I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that nuclear deterrence is about more than that.

Even allowing ad arguendo a Hiroshima-like escalation scenario, we don't actually need the US's nuclear arsenal to do that (see: Tokyo and Berlin bombing campaigns). That is to say--to the extent that NK being a nuclear power might play in an actual deterrence scenario, it's redundant. In all other scenarios, we're not using 1945 military doctrine anyway.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

The US has invaded countries for made up reasons. See Iraq, 2003.

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago
[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Still waiting on those WMDs.

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
120 points (94.8% liked)

World News

38978 readers
1389 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS