186

Title

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 61 points 9 months ago

That is partly correct. Wayland is not based on X.org. There is nothing rewritten, removed or simplified. It's an entirely new design, new code with a different license. And X11 isn't written by a single developer. XFree86 was started by 3 people, got maintained by an incorporated and then became X.org and sponsored by an industry consortium (the X.Org Foundation). Many many people and companies contributed. The rest is correct. It grew too complex and maintenance is a hassle. Wayland simplifies things and is a state of the art approach. Nobody removed features but they started from zero so it took a while to implement all important features. As of today we're almost there and Wayland is close to replacing X11.

[-] mub@lemmy.ml 19 points 9 months ago

Also, doesn't Wayland do things x11 can't, or did badly, like Variable refresh rate ?

[-] cheviotveneer@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Fractional scaling (per-display), input isolation...

[-] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago

And it will become more as development focuses on Wayland. If you look at X11's release history, there is (and has been for quite some time) only the most important things going on. That doesn't necessarily mean things are impossible to do with X11. But it's just the way things are once something slowly gets replaced by something else.

[-] kevincox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

That is the definition of a rewrite, no? They started from scratch. Otherwise it would be a refactor, cleanup or overhaul.

And yes, it was more than one developer but Wayland was largely started by at-the-time X maintainers.

[-] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hmmh, to me rewriting something means something like writing it again, or revising it. But it's entirely new, not based on the predecessor, they didn't have the old code or architecture in mind and it ended up in a different place with different features. So I don't see a "re-", just a "write". I'd say it's the same category of software (display servers / -protocols) but entirely different and independent from each other. I'd use the word 'rewrite' if they were dependent on each other in some form or if one was meant to replicate the other one.

[-] kevincox@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago

I think that's generally the point of a rewrite. To start from scratch with a better architecture. If you weren't changing the architecture then you can probably just keep incrementally improving it.

[-] elauso@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago

When you do a rewrite you want to create the same product as before just with better code / architecture. That's not what Wayland tries to do.

[-] zarkony@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, but the word rewrite implies that it would serve the same function and retain compatibility.

If someone wrote a new implementation of the x protocol, as a drop in replacement for the existing x.org server, you might call that a rewrite.

Wayland is an entirely different solution to the same problem. It doesn't follow the x protocol, and doesn't maintain compatibility with the x.org server.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don’t know that I would say that Wayland is not based on X11. It is a rewrite, not a fork but it is the next chapter of a common history.

Wayland and Xorg do share a lot of code in a way. Libraries like libinput, libdrm, KMS, and Mesa are used by both.

[-] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think @elauso@feddit.de did a better job explaining it... It's a rewrite if you're trying to create the same product as before. And that's not what Wayland is trying to do.

I mean we also don't say a car is a rewrite of a train (or vice versa) but they share some of the same components (wheels, seats, a driver...) And libinput, drm, mesa aren't copied to the source code. They're seperate projects and components/libraries that are used via an interface that makes them reusable. Lots of other projects also use the same set of libraries. For example networking. Or games that are built with the same game engine.

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
186 points (92.7% liked)

Linux

48001 readers
908 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS