165
Blorbo rule (feddit.de)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hallettj@beehaw.org 15 points 10 months ago

The justification for invading Iraq was a claim that they were developing nuclear weapons. It was well known at the time that the evidence was flimsy, and that even if true it was a flimsy excuse for an invasion. The main piece of evidence was an intercepted shipment of aluminum tubes that were soon shown to have nothing to do with a nuclear program. (See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_aluminum_tubes). That one is not a conspiracy theory.

[-] abbenm@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

And when it became clear that there were no nuclear weapons, it became a dishonest equivocation about weapons of mass destruction. Meanwhile, there was also loads of dishonest communication about Iraq's coordination with terrorist groups.

this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
165 points (100.0% liked)

196

16552 readers
2031 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS