I think I just figured out what the fundamental issue is with lemmy.ml. It's starting to sound like you don't think people are allowed to think different things than you do.

I read that this guy thinks Israel doesn't have the will to commit genocide, yes. I think they do; many representatives of the current Israeli government have said many times more or less that they want to keep pushing until the Palestinians are all moved elsewhere, dead of starvation, or driven into the sea. But, I'm not stopping the entire conversation to shriek at this guy until he starts agreeing with me about everything (or, more likely, just leaves). It's okay if I think one thing and he thinks something different.

And now, the simple fact that I'm willing to talk to him without starting to shriek at him, abandoning the thing we were talking about (which is how to construct the strongest possible case against Israel), is somehow a bad thing.

In what possible world is being willing to talk with someone who thinks different things than you some kind of "gotcha" that of course I'm lying about what I believe, because I'm having a relaxed conversation with someone who believes something different?