860
submitted 10 months ago by lledrtx@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] oce@jlai.lu 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I have heard that sometimes they hire talents just so the competitors don't get them, so talented people end up doing bullshit jobs and the salary discourages them from moving to more interesting but risky endeavors.

Edit: source https://www.businessinsider.com/google-meta-staff-do-fake-work-says-vc-keith-rabois-2023-3?r=US&IR=T

[-] steventrouble@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yup, I heard this rumor at Google when I worked there, and it does make some amount of sense. If the best engineers aren't working for the competition, then nobody else can compete. I doubt it's true, but it did often felt like we were paid to work on trivial tasks.

It's a shame because there was work that could have been done to improve Google's business, but execs took engineers off of them to move to Google Cloud (AKA, "sit on your hands and wait 2 years for your doc to be approved"). Google had so many good products that engineers truly wanted to work on like Stadia, Domains, and Area 120, and they cancelled them all. It happened so often that a couple of my coworkers pretended to hate working on their team "so it wouldn't get cancelled".

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
860 points (97.7% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
109 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS