652
submitted 10 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Whose responsibility is it to protect unhoused when it's freezing outside? An Ohio pastor opened his church to the homeless and was charged by city.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

I don't know, we don't want a shooting range next to a preschool or something. Zoning does some good.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

Since when did we care about children getting shot at school?

[-] pm_me_titties@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 10 months ago

Zoning is there to prevent wasting those targets by accident /s

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago

Oh come on. This is absolutely a government overreach.. yes, regulations can be good. They were not in this case.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

Maybe I’m misunderstanding the situation, but it seems to me the problem here isn’t the zoning laws, but draconian enforcement during an emergency.

Usually in times of hardship, anyone with half a brain knows not to strictly enforce laws like this that were clearly not intended to stop churches, businesses, or private individuals from helping people.

It’s like charging someone for violating zoning by taking in neighbours whose homes were destroyed. In normal times, there are laws against turning yourself into a boarding house without a permit, but nobody reasonable would enforce that after a tornado.

The problem is moronic enforcement.

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

The regulation/law could have been written better. That's why I called it overreach. They could have written an emergency clause or wrote an emergency regulation/law that specified overruling certain laws.

That's what I meant by overreach. I'm generally pro regulations when it comes to safety which is what the sleeping and eating one I assume was written about.

[-] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You mean like here in maryville, tn, where the new Smith and Wesson factory and test range shares a property line with Middlesettlements Elementary School?

Nothing quite like kids hearing gunshots outside at school.

And it wasn’t just “allowed” by zoning laws. The city basically did backflips to get the plant to move here. They even convinced the city of Alcoa to cede the land to the city of Maryville without telling Alcoa why they wanted it.

Bunch of shady shit all around, but the whole county basically sucks Smith and Wesson’s dick now. They even had a big festival on the day the plant opened to celebrate it.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 10 months ago

Wouldn't a daycare/private preschool and a gun range both be the same light commercial zones?

There might be regulation keeping you from owning a gun range near a school, but I don't think zoning helps

[-] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Seems like a shooting range next to a school could be a deterrent.

Hmmm, which school to shoot up? This one next to a bunch of folks with weapons and ammo within arms reach practicing marksmanship or any of these other ones without that?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Not this zoning.

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
652 points (99.1% liked)

News

23376 readers
1764 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS