843
Confusing... (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by kaptaan_jack@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] foo@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Multiplication is a notation which means add some number by itself a number of times.

5 x 3 = 5 +5 + 5

2 * 4 = 2 + 2 + 2 +2

So when you see some like 2 + 4 * 2 it literally means. 2+4+4

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By that logic it could just as well be 2 + 4 * 2 = (2 + 4) + (2 + 4) = 12. You still need to know to multiply first, or it's arbitrary

Edit: a lot of you are missing my point. The expression above is wrong, duh, but my point is that the choice to "expand out" the multiplication first is a convention that the mathematics community agreed on, not a fact that can be proven or measured. That's why it's arbitrary. @kogasa put nicely, PEMDAS is just a notation, it's how we agreed to read and write our math, but the underlying math is no different. If we all agreed to scramble the order of operations, say to add before we multiply, expressions will look different, parentheses may need to be added or removed, but they will still be mathematically consistent if we are consistent in writing and reading in that agreed upon order of operations.

[-] sneakattack@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

No you expand it all out first.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know that my example is wrong, I'm trying to make a point

[-] biddy@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

In your example you lose distributivity. (2+4)2 is 22+4*2, which doesn't matter for numbers but it matters for algebra. If addition comes first then there's no way to represent distribution.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The distributive law, assuming commutativity and other axioms, is a*(b+c) = (a*b) + (a*c). Notice how it does not matter in which order you evaluate + and * in this expression due to my use of parentheses.

PEMDAS is notation. It has no influence on the actual underlying math, only how we write it.

[-] biddy@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

You're absolutely right, not sure what I was thinking.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

PEMDAS is notation. It has no influence on the actual underlying math, only how we write it.

Thanks, I've been trying to figure out how to put this and you did it concisely!

[-] foo@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

It's not logic, it's that what it means. 2*4 literally means 2+2+2+2. Just like 8/2 means how many times you can add 2 to itself until you get 8.

That's what it means.

So why use braces? Because in more advanced maths you have more complex expressions that can't be express in just multiplication which often occur in algebra or beyond.

For example what does 2 * ( a + 3) actually mean? Like why do we need to do the addition first. Its because we don't know how many times we need to repeat the addition until we know what a means.

Let's say a are points on an axis, and at some point it is worth three the. At that moment that expression is 2 * (3 +3) = 2 * 6 which is equal to 2+2+2+2+2

But in the next moment a might be 1

Right?

What's arbitrary are the labels on the rules. The rules themselves aren't arbitrary.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

See my edit, I think you misunderstand me

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

“expand out” the multiplication first is a convention that the mathematics community agreed on, not a fact that can be proven

Order of operations proof - simple version

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
843 points (95.7% liked)

Memes

45727 readers
827 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS