75
cache (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jcg@halubilo.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could implement in-closet indexing instead to make the cache misses hurt less, trading off some extra insertion time but needing less memory for the cache which is much more expensive cost wise. At this point you're storing almost your whole DB in the cache and your room's a mess.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

19572 readers
1863 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS