786
STOP WRITING C (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago by Maven@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

For the programmer? Very no.

For saving space if run via interperter? No.

For running compiled for conventional CPUs? No.

Compared to CISC instruction sets? Absolutely no.

BF might be highly efficient if crunched down to a bit-packed representation (3 bits per instruction) and run on an FPGA that understands it.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 8 months ago

For demonstrating to CS freshmen that Turing Completeness isn't that remarkable of a language feature: very highly efficient.

[-] MinekPo1@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 8 months ago

its efficient in terms of compiler size ! nya

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
786 points (93.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32060 readers
1496 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS