296
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
296 points (97.4% liked)
World News
32306 readers
412 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Genocide is genocide.
Harm reduction arguments only work to a point. If genocide is still the outcome, then it isn't really harm reduction.
If we're here now, then the harm reduction arguments worked while the plan didn't.
What does that even mean?
We are now in a scenario where we'll settle for a genocidal monster, because we keep voting for harm reduction. Harm reduction failed in practice; it was never a good idea in the first place.