717
submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 133 points 2 years ago
[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago

Propaganda is a powerful tool.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

way down at the bottom here::

opt in polling from web based "interview". So, probably. nobody even remotely tech savy (aka has an ad blocker) ever participated. but anyhow... here's what pew research has to say about the effects of interview mode:

Where differences occurred, they were especially large on three broad types of questions: Items that asked the respondent to assess the quality of their family and social life produced differences of 18 and 14 percentage points, respectively, with those interviewed on the phone reporting higher levels of satisfaction than those who completed the survey on the Web.

Questions about societal discrimination against several different groups also produced large differences, with telephone respondents more apt than Web respondents to say that gays and lesbians, Hispanics and blacks face a lot of discrimination. However, there was no significant mode difference in responses to the question of whether women face a lot of discrimination.

Web respondents were far more likely than those interviewed on the phone to give various political figures a “very unfavorable” rating, a tendency that was concentrated among members of the opposite party of each figure rated.

Statistically significant mode effects also were observed on several other questions. Telephone respondents were more likely than those interviewed on the Web to say they often talked with their neighbors, to rate their communities as an “excellent” place to live and to rate their own health as “excellent.” Web respondents were more likely than phone respondents to report being unable to afford food or needed medical care at some point in the past twelve months.

ultimately, the legitimacy of the poll would depend on where they solicited their subjects in the poll. You're likely to get a far different answer with advertisements on Truth Social than you would with advertisements on, lets say, a palistinian-american subreddit. but that wasn't addressed in the report, so. we'll never really know.

[-] Shirasho@lemmings.world 25 points 2 years ago

Opt-in polling is so bad. It means you only get answers from people with strong opinions. They are polls where the results are shaped like a U instead of a bell curve so it rarely represents the actual 95 percentile.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

I don't think it's opt-in in that way though. They have a pre-existing list of millions of pre-screened people and they're selecting a representative sample from that list. Fivethirtyeight ranks them fairly highly among other polls -- certainly high enough for this opinion poll to be considered accurate.

[-] Hamartia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Fivethirtyeight only grades them on their ability to predict american election results. I don't think that's the same as advocating for their efficacy in producing leading public opinion polls.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

You’re right, kinda. Issue polling is generally better than horse race polling and YouGov is no exception.

[-] Hamartia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's a serious issue when there's a clear political bias in the founders. They put more effort into steering the narrative than objectively reporting it.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Sure, and were there a clear bias your comment would have value.

[-] Hamartia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If you haven't seen any clear bias then you probably have a close enough outlook to them to not notice. And that's fine, I don't require everyone to have the same opinion as me for their comments to have value.

My impression of bias is probably born out of the leading polls that rightwing media and thinktanks in the UK commission them to do. You can fairly argue that these polls are externally commissioned so their tenor is a product of their issuer not yougov. But the overall impression I got was that they could be readily depended on to produce misleading propaganda against labour when it wasn't being run by corporate technocrats.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's still selecting from a list of people who have something to say, though.

As far as how accurately they represent broad swaths of america... well, that's a different matter. I would expect your average american to be far more luke warm to any given subject than respondents to a poll.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

That's probably just a problem with polls though -- people who won't answer aren't included. But they're saying that 26-32% of Americans are "unsure," and that sounds pretty lukewarm. Their methodology does sound odd to me too but if it was flawed it would show in the election data, right? Elections are a brutal testing ground. Hundreds of surveys have been predictive and high quality on average.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Agreed on all of that.

I would have guessed 1/3 are “wtf! stop it”, a 1/3 are “bomb them harder!” And then there’s everyone else just doing their thing, going to work. Going to school.

[-] sik0fewl@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago

Pretty easy now to see how Nazi Germany got away with it.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I know, right. These past 7 years have really made that clear.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

They didn't even have social media back then to help spread misinformation. People were so quick to believe anything they heard someone say loudly.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I wonder how many people in that poll could locate Gaza on a map with no names.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I couldn't, but I also couldn't find Israel... or Greece... or Idaho... I'm just really bad at geography in general.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

If Jimmy Kimmel is any representation of reality, they would probably point to Australia.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

My parents are in the other two thirds

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

By vote or volume?

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
717 points (95.2% liked)

News

36453 readers
666 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS