76
submitted 9 months ago by naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bisby@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

But that wasnt the threat. They were going to stop him from blowing up the plane by.... blowing up the plane.

[-] jaykay@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 months ago

There is a difference between the plane being blown up over London, or shot down over farm fields

[-] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

By blowing up the plane before it can blow up and whatever else it hits.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

In theory, the threat could have just been a bluff to gain control of the plane.

[-] bisby@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

bluffing a threat to the plane by snapchatting your friend would be a weird move. No one on the plane even knew a "threat" was made.

It seems like "we have no details at all about the threat (because it wasn't actually credible), so let's just be prepared for every situation" is the logic.

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
76 points (80.2% liked)

World News

32281 readers
672 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS