739
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WatTyler@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're absolutely correct and if there's one thing I wish I included it would've been a 'charitable' description of the possibilities of Brexit. The reason why it wasn't included is that I think the actual motivations of the arch-Brexiteers within parliament and the media aren't a contributing factor to why Brexit happened. They certainly had a vision for a potential Brexit but I don't think that played any role in the decision to hold a referendum, and I believe only a very small subset of the 52% voted Leave did so because they shared the 'Singapore with worse weather' vision of the Brexit elite.

[-] TawdryPorker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, I agree. I just wanted to point out that Brexit wouldn't have happened without some fairly serious money being put behind it (UKIP's funding had to come from somewhere and there were not one but two pro-Brexit campaigns Vote Leave and LeaveEU) and that money had to spent with a purpose.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
739 points (98.6% liked)

World News

32365 readers
622 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS