279
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago

Wouldn't shining back be counterproductive for this? You want the solar panels to harness the energy, not returning it to sender

[-] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Beaming the light back is a reference to completely separate items left on the moon: 6 reflectors (3 Apollo, 2 lunokhod, and 1 chandrayaan). It's a grid of reflector cells like a huge, metal version of the reflectors you see on cars and bicycles. By measuring the time between shining the laser and recording it's return, scientists can measure the exact distance to the moon and how it's changing - both it's orbital wobble and it's drift.

So you're correct, there's no desire to have the laser bounce of the solar panels. The comment was just citing the existence of a light source powerful enough to reach the moon from earth.

[-] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago

I'm familiar with the Apollo retro-reflectors. Though in all seriousness I doubt a laser would provide a substantial amount of power (unless you have a specialty designed energy collector like in RFID)

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
279 points (98.6% liked)

Not The Onion

11847 readers
924 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS