992
submitted 10 months ago by Riccosuave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Former President Donald Trump must pay writer E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in damages for repeatedly defaming her, a jury found Friday.

The nine-person jury began deliberations in federal court in New York at 1:40 p.m. ET and reached a verdict in just under three hours.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

She will never see a dime. He gets away with it again, and he will continue to until he is actually taken into custody.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago

This is different. All his properties in New York are under receivership. If and when they are forcibly sold to pay the judgement in the New York Civil fraud trial any remaining funds will go directly to E. Jean Carroll as she will be a lien holder on those assets.

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

Judgment creditors are last in line, the government is first. He won't have anything left over.

[-] preludeofme@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It won't matter he will just delay and appeal till he dies and then his kids will do the same thing and sue to keep it from ever happening

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Appeals are not an infinite process, and as we have already seem multiple times just this month the New York State Court of Appeals has either denied his requests for appeal or swiftly ruled against him. Sometimes the rock hard cock of the law does catch up with you.

As Martin Luther King Jr. said, "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice."

Edit: I changed my initial statement because I forgot this case was in federal court not state court.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

What did MLK say about the “rock hard cock of the law?”

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

I think it was something about having a dream and then needing to change the sheets.

[-] yukichigai@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago

IIRC he has to put up a cash bond equal to the value of the judgement in order to appeal it. In other words he has to come up with $83.3 million in cash in order to appeal. I'm not sure he has that even if he raids the campaign fund.

[-] preludeofme@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Well that's at least good to know

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
992 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2053 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS