375
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The blockbuster remark came moments before closing arguments in Trump's second trial in a case brought by E. Jean Carroll

A federal judge threatened Donald Trump's attorney Alina Habba with jail time on Friday, after the former president's lawyer kept contesting a ruling after it had been issued.

"You are on the verge of spending some time in the lockup," senior U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan warned. "Sit down."

The bombshell remark came moments before the start of closing arguments in Trump's second trial in a case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tedrow@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago

She understands. She is trying to get attention and is desperate.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

I honestly don't think she does. Why would she risk being thrown in jail for that? She did multiple things that made the judge reprimand her.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

Rudy Giuliani was a prosecutor and deputy attorney general. He was also well known as “America’s Mayor” after rallying New Yorkers in the wake of 9/11. Yet that didn’t stop him from ruining his own life committing crimes to protect Trump.

It’s really bizarre!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

I agree, but Rudy has never said anything remotely like this-

“Somebody said to me ‘Alina, would you rather be smart or pretty?’ and I said ‘Oh easy, pretty… I can fake being smart’.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/alina-habba-trump-lawyer-court-b2481296.html

And I don't think that statement was part of some sort of complicated 4-D chess to protect trump. The easiest explanation is she's stupid but pretty and willing to work for free. What more could Trump ask for?

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

I can fake being smart.

Not well.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 months ago

she can fake being smart to stupid people quite well

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

She's not wrong. I have someone in my extended family who was a willowy 5'10 very attractive woman with no kids who couldn't have out-mathed my at the time sixth grader (really, no hyperbole, I was present for real world examples of this happening) who is the CFO of a company in San Diego with a beach front condo.

[-] groupofcrows@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

She could've used makeup and surgery to fake being pretty.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Well, we both know she didn't choose smart.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 15 points 9 months ago

She knows the judge has on kid gloves for the trial so as not to give any reason for an appeals court to overturn. So she's pushing her luck. Also makes get famous for "sticking it to the judge" in Republican circles.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

There is nothing to gain by concluding its stupidity. The Republican party harbors malice; Trump harbors malice. A razor doesn't supersede evidence.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Do you really think Habba is playing 4-D chess? She's working for a man who never pays his lawyers.

That's because she's angling for a job with one of the Republican news networks.

She didn't take the case because she thought she would get paid directly for it.

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

and gets quite a few of them disbarred.

[-] jak@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

So either she’s smart enough to pass the bar and stupid enough not to understand how payment works or she’s not looking for financial compensation.

The bar isn’t that hard, but it’s hard to be that dumb and still pass it.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 10 points 9 months ago

Because it really isn't a risk at this point. She's been in contempt of court many times already.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

To perform for the base and lend credence to the "witch hunt" claim.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago
[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 9 months ago

Don't misunderestimate your enemies.

  • George W. Bush
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't call him smart either.

[-] rifugee@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I think the use of "misunderestimate" already implied that, eh?

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago

Yeah that’s why he acted like that. To get people to just think he’s just an old southern fool.

[-] jak@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

Yes, the Connecticut-born, Yale-educated southern good old boy was probably not smarter than his Vice President, but he wasn’t anywhere near as dumb as he seemed

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago

Don’t forget governor of Texas after all that

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Never underestimate the stupidity of a republican.

[-] Tedrow@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
375 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2002 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS