323
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 152 points 10 months ago

Yeah, because it couldn't possibly be that Americans are opposed to genocide.

For fuck's sake, Pelosi. Witch hunts are supposed to be a Republican thing.

[-] Baines@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

wouldn’t be the first time Russia has done something like this, that said, how about we stop supporting genocide and it won’t matter

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Wouldn't be the first time democrats have done this, either.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The best propaganda in the world is the truth. I wouldn't even be surprised if the Russians were signal boosting Palestinians in some way. Doesn't mean we should keep supporting a genocide though. Israel fucked up.

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They're absolutely boosting Palestinians. Russia wants to prove to the world that Israel is carrying out a genocide, and that Israel/US are heavily leaning on international entities to delay any meaningful condemnation from bodies like the ICJ or UN. Russia wants to highlight the moral hypocrisy of the West, and prove that Palestinians are being exterminated

This is not because Russia cares about human rights. Rather it is because they want to paint the United States/The West as obvious hypocrites with no moral standing. Which will enable Russia to commit larger atrocities in Ukraine without meaningful rebuke. After all, these same international agencies permitted the genocide in Gaza, who are they now to condemn Russia when they massacre an entire Ukrainian city? It also will provide cover for China's invasion of Taiwan, and their further suppression of Uyghurs in NW China.

Israel is certainly engaging in genocide against Palestinian. But this crime, and the US' whitewashing of it, will be used by Russia/China as cover to carry out their own escalated human rights abuses. And by that time, the US will have lost its moral leadership in the world and Western international institutions will have similarly been shown to be utterly useless puppets of America. Which is all a very bad thing for the weak and non-nuclear peoples of the world

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, but that was always going to happen. Using it to silence protest is... Maddening.

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

She gets intelligence briefings and does not interact with normal people. So I'm sure that genuinely colors her perception of reality on this matter. Plus she's old and has never lived in a time where Americans oppose Israel to this extent - so of course she thinks it's all astroturfed rather than being genuine

Doesn't excuse her behavior, obviously. But there is a plausible explanation for it aside from her being evil (which she is, but other factors are also at play here)

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

While it's all certainly Americans, and we don't like genocides, she is correct in assuming that Putin wants Trump to win, and this would be an effective way to further that goal.

Don't forget Putin was KGB.

I imagine it's more through social media manipulation and misinformation than FSB funding, I suppose I could be wrong. By way of example, though, how many times have you heard that white phosphorous is banned, even though that's not exactly true?

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

FSB is using social media among other things. Active Measures is one of primary ways how they operated and they adapted it well to the Internet age.

Have you thought how come that antivaxx people also have very pro Russia anti EU, anti UN anti NATO views?

Covid was a great catalyst in spreading disinformation.

Same thing with far right people in US and Europe, how come their views are mostly pro Russia and how come they greatly overlap with antivaxx?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I wanted you to be wrong, but you’re right.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Thanks for providing a link.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I've honestly just stopped doing that explainer because Israel is using it illegally.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

True. But the propaganda line doesn't acknowledge the distinction, and just tries to spread the idea that the US does not care about international law, which is false.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Ahhh yes. I had someone run that with landmines too. According to them we can't get in compliance with international law until we de-mine the Korean DMZ...

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Landmines are also not banned. There's a lot of subtly misleading bullshit on the internet.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

There is a section on them that most of the world has signed. It's basically the US, Russia, and China that haven't signed.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It's a little more complicated than that, because there are many different kinds of landmines. Nobody bans them all.

[-] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

[sarcasm]

That sounds like what a Russian propagandian would say.

If that’s not a word, it should be a word. Lets also rename the continent to Propagandia while we are at it.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Thank you, Flying Squid. I couldn't agree more. The Trump-resemblance in attitude on her part has been disheartening. BTW, I tend to really like your comments. Have a good day.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Thank you, you too!

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
323 points (93.1% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2051 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS