212
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TechAnon@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

This doesn't put education into the hands of corporations. It's here already... on the internet. You can watch entire Standford or MIT courses for nothing right now.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago
[-] TechAnon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I learned new programming languages online using courses like those. I use them fairly consistently at work. I also went to a 4 year university prior to that. Learning online was both cheaper and faster. Also, a few university classes I took were 100% online. No difference except for cost.

I test those that I hire now with real-world problems - all of which have college degrees due to company policy to limit which resumes I can see based on requirements. There's a huge difference between these people - some don't know anything and some are fairly well-versed. This standard education thing isn't working.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago

Online lectures are a tool you can use to educate yourself; the lectures aren't educating you.

Education is an action done by a human being.

[-] TechAnon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

If that's your definition then it's the same as college. Most courses I took had 200-300 students in a large auditorium where we just sat there a listened to the professor, took notes, read the book (that cost $300) and took a few tests. I also took a few online courses in obtaining my degree. Educating myself later was faster and more efficient.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 years ago

So you never buddied up with other people to study together after class? You never asked questions about the text or lecture?

Those are things you just can't do at home, and are an incredible learning resource for students.

[-] TechAnon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I only partnered with people for projects where we were forced to work together (this was rare). I've asked a few questions during office hours regarding some work. I could absolutely do both of these things from home. It may be better to do in person classes for some people who like the interaction and overall "college experience," but that comes down to preference. If people knew they could do all of it from home for free AND they could take a test to prove the knowledge, many wouldn't definitely take that route.

[-] shiftymccool@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So is having a question and going out to find the answer yourself. I can only speak from a web dev perspective, but being able to answer your own questions via research is a huge skill and very useful in the workplace. It's also a great way to get different opinions on how things should be done. Your professor isn't always right

[-] jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one -4 points 2 years ago

Neither is living at a party institution for four years

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 years ago

Cool lie 👍 hope you don't actually believe that

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
212 points (98.2% liked)

News

35849 readers
779 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS