1055
mic drop (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I get where you're getting at since it's a minimum standard of living. Two bedrooms basically means parents in one room, 1-2 kids in another. With two children being the default. Once you get to three or more, or for people who don't want mixed gender siblings in the same room/heavy age differences, then the two bedroom becomes the three bedroom.

I definitely err on your side of the logic though. That is technically minimum. In reality, there's enough money for that three bedroom, the rich just hoarde it all. Most landlords got nothing to do with that lol.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

I am a lot more skeptical of how high a "minimum wage" could even be considering the further automation of even "skilled" fields at this point. Which is why I am a strong advocate for Universal Basic Income to decouple survival from labor.

But if you are fighting the minimum wage fight: At least fight for something that would actually cover cost of living.

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
1055 points (95.4% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
89 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS