495
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 51 points 9 months ago

Context:

German:

  • "siebenundneunzig"
  • = "sevenandninety"

English:

  • = "ninety-seven"

French:

  • "quatre-vingt-dix-sept"
  • = "four-twenty-ten-seven"
[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

It's shit like that why I wonder people just don't update their languages, remove useless letters, nonsensical loan words exonyms, etc.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago
[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

... A dictionary? We already have those in English lol.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Oxford University Press doesn't have governmental enforcement powers the way the OQLF does.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Users dictate a language more than anything else

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

No, French has private dictionaries that aren't normative. This isn't that.

The Académie is a quasi-governemental institution built by Louis XIV to impose a normative version of French. They initially reformed the language but quickly ended up enforcing the linguistic status quo. French hasn't had a (much needed) structural reform in about two centuries.

What the academy defines to be "proper French" is essentially the only French that is used by the government, media, and school system, and they refuse to acknowledge changes in usage at every turn.

This means that French is set in stone and mid-19th century books have essentially the same grammar as 21st century French apart from some very minor differences.

(I won't get into the systemic and very successful repression of minority languages which is closely related).

[-] JayObey711@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

German did. And it worked. One of the reasons is probably that written German is uniform everywhere. I imagine language reformes are harder and less effective when dialects are still big.

[-] Taigagaai@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Like many things in life, languages aren't necessary logical but I'm looking forward to your efforts to finally get everyone into Esperanto!

[-] voodooattack@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Or Lojban.

Edit:

Lojban (pronounced [ˈloʒban]) is a logical, constructed, human language created by the Logical Language Group which aims to be syntactically unambiguous.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Or quantum grammar, which would solve the problems of normal languages where people have misunderstandings by making it so that nobody can communicate anything enough to have a misunderstanding again because it's all gibberish.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Wynn_Miller

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

We all do constantly with each word spoken. Language is updated without rest forever.

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
495 points (94.8% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5716 readers
140 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS