608
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Attorney Roberta Kaplan said former President Donald Trump threw papers across a table and stormed off during a deposition at Mar-a-Lago after learning that his legal team had agreed to provide her lunch.

Kaplan, who has represented clients in high-profile cases against Trump, including E. Jean Carroll, said on an episode of the “George Conway Explains it All (to Sarah Longwell)” podcast recorded Thursday that she rejected the former president’s request that they work through a lunch break because he believed the deposition was “a waste of my time.”

“And then you could kind of see the wheel spinning in his brain. You could really almost see it,” Kaplan told Republican strategist Sarah Longwell and conservative attorney George Conway, a longtime Trump critic. “And he said, ‘Well, you’re here in Mar-a-Lago. What do you think you’re going to do for lunch? Where are you going to get lunch?’”

Kaplan said she told him that his attorneys had “graciously offered to provide” her team with lunch — a common civil practice between opposing legal teams.

“At which point there was a huge pile of documents, exhibits, sitting in front of him, and he took the pile and he just threw it across the table. And stormed out of the room,” Kaplan shared, adding that Trump specifically yelled at his lawyer Alina Habba for providing them lunch.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 153 points 9 months ago

Oooh, they buried the good stuff here:

In a separate anecdote, Kaplan detailed the end of the deposition when she was set to leave, saying that Trump told her: “See you next Tuesday” – a phrase that is often used as a derogatory euphemism directed at women.

Kaplan said that she was initially confused, as their next meeting was set for a Wednesday.

I won't quote all of that part, because it's worth reading. Go ahead, click on it. Donald Trump is such a mean girl.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 92 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I won't quote all of that part

I will, because not everyone has the time or the desire to go to a news site and get blasted with ads and tracking cookies for an article they are only marginally interested in. So here's the rest:

“I wasn’t in on the joke, so I had no idea. Then we get into the car and my colleagues are like, ‘Robbie, do you know what that means?’ And I’m like, ‘No, what are you talking about?’ They tell me and I’m like, oh my God, thank God I didn’t know because had I known, I for sure would have gotten angry. There’s no question I would have gotten angry,” Kaplan said

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago

You also missed the part when, after the deposition was over, Trump's lawyers, who we all know now are incompetent and inattentive to details, immediately sprung up to confirm that they were now off the record. They knew what he was going to say.

That means they had to plan it. Trump must have gone to them ahead of time and said "I'm gonna call her a cunt straight to her face, and there's nothing you can do to make me stop". So they had to enact a strategy to make sure it didn't get into the record. And then, they probably had to snicker a bit to prove they thought the joke was totally OK and they really got her good.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

I really do imagine that everyone of them has to fake laugh at all his jokes. I bet there's always a stare and a long uncomfortable silence whenever someone doesn't react quick enough, like you see in the movies.

[-] mPony@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Having to be a personal sycophant to that jerk is arguably close to selling your soul to the devil.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

Devils at least hold up their end of a bargain. Sure, they may try to trick you, but they don't withhold their end of am agreement. What do you think the odds are that these lawyers are going to be paid in full?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 22 points 9 months ago

Similar story.

After catching Covid, he wanted to leave the hospital wearing a Superman shirt. Someone had to talk the President of the United States out of acting like a child.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Man, I remember that. Then they lied to the country about how sick he really was. They had discussions about whether he should go to the hospital or not and ultimately they decided he was getting worse and worse and that he had to go right then so that he could be seen walking to the helicopter. If they had waited, he would not have then able to walk. Of course he was vaccinated and immediately got the best care, I wonder how many of his dumbass supporters died because they figured "well Trump lived without vaccinations or a mask, I will too."

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

Reminds me of a different story.

After he noped out of the WW1 Centennial ceremonies because it was raining, they had to arrange a photo op of him going to Arlington in the rain to place flowers. Ignoring the fact that he could have gone to Arlington every day of his Presidency...

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 9 months ago

That means they had to plan it.

I don't think that's true at all. It sounds like day 1 material for "lawyering for cunts school". Like if you've just had a tense meeting with the opposition, and your client is a childish idiot, then of course he's going to try a parting jibe. You would absolutely 100% pop up and say "that's it folks off the record now LOL"

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 9 months ago

I can't imagine a better response even if she knew what he meant. "What do you mean Donald? Our meeting is Wednesday, did you forget?"

[-] Sir_Fridge@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

My hero.

No seriously I really didn't want to deal with that.

[-] DharkStare@lemmy.world 89 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"See you next Tuesday" is a derogatory euphemism?

Edit: I would have never figured out what it was supposed to mean on my own. I had never heard of that before and judging by all the quick replies it's a more well known insult then I would have guessed.

[-] ttsci@lemmy.world 109 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

See (C) you (U) next (N) Tuesday (T) - yes, it's childish.

[-] Hubi@feddit.de 29 points 9 months ago

No way lmao, I never would've thought of that.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 13 points 9 months ago

Good people don't.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 months ago

The former president of the United States, what a classy guy.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Mmm, yes, please become the eternal emperor of the free world. 50,000 years and finally we've found the Chosen One.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

She should come back on Tuesday

[-] stratosfear@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 9 months ago

And ask for another best sandwich

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Thank you, I had never heard of it

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

It's the type of thing a junior high kid would say to a frenemy to sound edgy, while at the same time avoiding all the "naughty words" that would get them in trouble with the teacher.

So, totally on brand for Donald Trump. Actually a bit too mature for him, since he's said directly that his temperment hasn't changed at all since first grade.

[-] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 26 points 9 months ago

C U Next Tuesday.

He was calling her a cunt without using the word.

[-] mPony@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

she could have replied "See you in prison" but she probably has more class than that.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

A third grader would say this and think they are so cool

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 9 months ago

I wonder if her not picking up on it made him even angrier? Almost as if she's made of Teflon and his childish insults bounced right off her.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I had never heard it before just now either.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

me neither, but ima start using it where appropriate. like a passing farewell to the asswipe that parks his obnoxious suv in front of my building all day, every day. is 2 hour parking only but he's buddies with a local cop so they never ticket him--only anyone else that dare park in 'his' spot.

[-] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

Spell out the letters and phonetics: C - U - Next - Tuesday , spells…

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

C U Next Tuesday

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

According to urban dictionary:

See You Next Tuesday

A clandestine method of calling someone a cunt.

Particularly effective when used prior to a three day week end.

C: See U: You N: Next T: Tuesday

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I know what C U Next Tuesday means in a derogatory way, but ngl if I really had a meeting scheduled for next week with the person who said it to me, I would just assume that’s what they were referring to.

Yes, in this case the meeting was on Wednesday, but my initial thought would be to wonder if I was misremembering what day the meeting was supposed to take place.

Even if you know about it, it’s not always obvious depending on the context. However, if I have a brief but unpleasant interaction with someone who I had never met before and never planned to see again, said it as I was walking away, then yeah - it would probably register that they were being a dick.

[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

Ohhhhh. Thank you for spelling it out. C U N T. Got it

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 9 months ago

And thank you for spelling it out again because my dumbass didn't catch it again... Lol

I was literally just assuming that he was calling her a prostitute that have regulars on specific days lol

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That is exactly what I thought!

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Also that he asked the kitchen to make bad food.

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Stop trying to make quid pro quo happen, Donald!

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

I hope it was referred to the judge; this exact type of behavior has resulted in findings of contempt and sanctions regularly.

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
608 points (97.9% liked)

News

23376 readers
1974 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS